November 28th, 2011

finally able to sit down tonight and crank out a model… not quite “betchin” yet but it’s getting there… still a work in progress…

November 25th, 2011
I don’t have to have a physical church. What could be more beautiful than the church in which you are surrounded by nature. This is my God.
Julius Shulman, architectural photographer
November 22nd, 2011

Stairs are a designed experience, use them…

Unless I am carrying something heavy or fragile, I always take the stairs. Call me old-school, I’ll take it, just don’t make me take the elevator. I really enjoy the formal entrance of the Rudolph Building with its wide stretch, low rise and deep run. It makes me appreciate the process of entering the building as it was intended and designed. Whereas, I find elevators cheapen the experience of a building and leave me feeling a bit jipped when I immediately arrive at my destination. I have spent hours designing stairs in my studio project, and interrogated various stair typologies - ie the ones that were meant as a means of egress verses the ones that exist only as a symbol and never actually used. 

*(Yale Architecture Building by Paul Rudolph on the left, Nanjing Museum by Steven Holl on the right.)

Stairs are wonderful! They force you to understand where you are in a building, what each level means to the different users, and most importantly, allows you to interact on a normal and perfectly brief moment with others inhabiting the building as well. The elevator, however, forces you into an awkwardly silent, deathly state, where you’re constantly teeter-tottering on the idea of asking the person you’re in the elevator with how they are doing. Once you do, it’s always time to go - never allowing a conversation to blossom or end smoothly. The stair allows you to say hi, engage in conversation if desired, or smile at the very least. And, a well-designed stair, like the Yale Architecture building, provides landings at every turnaround, making it easy for one to step to the side to talk or simply “rest” quietly and look out the openings on to York Street. These human interactions are at the core of what architecture is able to achieve, and are important to consider when designing. 

I say to hell with the elevator, move your ass, and take the stairs… it just may get a little firmer! Who knows!?!


November 18th, 2011
bryanmaddock:

Paul Rudolph Hall Expansion [Gwathmey Siegel / 2008]

thanks for this bryan. missed seeing you last night at the reception… 

bryanmaddock:

Paul Rudolph Hall Expansion [Gwathmey Siegel / 2008]

thanks for this bryan. missed seeing you last night at the reception… 

November 16th, 2011
Man has access to the entire mind of the Creator, is himself the creator in the finite.

I came across this quote last night in my reading for a course on drawing, pulled from Nature by Ralph Waldo Emerson. This quote was used in reference to the presence of the artist as the creator who embeds a sense of authorship, process, and even himself as the subject of the work. However, like most of the readings about drawing - relating to truth, perception, and self-reflection - I immediately apply it to life in general. I feel strongly that no answers in life can be answered by anyone but yourself. Each person holds “self-evident truths” that are so ingrained into the person they are, that to act upon another’s inclinations is a crime. Understanding another’s point of view, of course, is very different than putting into action their particular and subjective interpretation. After all they are calling on their own “self-evident truths” that are inherently different than your own. It is important to ask yourself questions and recognize your own perception of situations. This will affirm your understanding of your self as the Creator… one who puts in to action innate truths which will bolster, if not validate, the integrity of your finite solution. In architecture, knowing and constantly being aware of what you want to achieve, too, leads to an oeuvre that is consistently evolving over time towards a particular articulation of your own style. 


November 15th, 2011

crazy beautiful video… totally feeds to my obsession with bodies, muscles, dancing, lines, light, shadow, contrast, intensity and just general passion in motion… good stuff @amritaraja

Reblogged from Still processing.
November 7th, 2011
No one feels another’s grief, no one understands another’s joy. People imagine they can reach one another. In reality they only pass each other by.
Franz Schubert, Austrian music composer, 1797-1828
November 7th, 2011

Yessss… M.Arch I classmate, Cortez Crosby, nails it when asked about what the Yale Building Project tries to do and what we all accomplished this summer! Note about the other speaker, Paul Brouard… 82 years old, arrived before us at 6am every day, worked just as hard and long, took on hard tasks on his own, and never once showed signs of slowing down… an amazing man and inspiration to us all. My favorite memories this summer were teaming up with him on tasks, (ie air ducts and floor trim) and constantly laughing. Adore his spirit. 

November 5th, 2011

architecture schoool makes me so cool that…

i am spending my saturday night casting a mold of my model in rockite…

note: if you inhale it, then it can harden in your lungs… same goes for the eyeballs… wearing a mask and goggles is a quick way to establish your classiness while mixing and pouring… 

November 3rd, 2011
[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

Variazione Di Un Tango by Dustin O’Halloran

 - I love this take on the Tango. All the mystery and charm is still there, but with a little more of a sensual and creepy vibe…

shared from exfm

October 30th, 2011

sketches of design for contemporary art museum… investigating the “wall” as plane, surface, division, light reflector… also looking at the building’s relationship to the central corridor that pierces the entire building in sectional models… 

October 27th, 2011

designing a kunsthall is like redesigning our conventions…

Last week we had to build 1/2” scale models of an interior “room” (dare I call it such a conventional thing!) in our studio design proposal - a contemporary art museum on a pier. These were light study models showing how daylight entered the space, reflected off of walls, penetrated through the space and/or dissipated from above. We calculated the angles of reflection and the type of reflections based off of the color and surface material. We provided photographs of the daylighting effects during winter and summer solstice, and the spring/fall equinox. These images were achieved by using a cut-out “nomen” triangle on sun dial of 40 degrees positioned on the model itself.

Studio critic, Joel Sanders made an interesting point that none of the models that he was seeing re-defined contemporary art or made a statement about an artist’s curatorial motives. While we all focused on the prompt of the assignment, Joel was passionate about depicting a space that could house a variety of media. He was annoyed that the students chose Lichtenstein’s and random yarn as examples of contemporary art -things he’s already seen. He proceeded to say that artists today fight being defined by one medium, and that they are constantly mixing media either in one piece of work, or they already have a body of work that reaches across a range of media. He concluded that our spaces should reflect this shift - to make spaces that are not harmonious, but eclectic, like that of the new artist. He said these spaces should challenge the conventional way of viewing different mediums ie. video art does not always have to be in a black box, or sculpture does not have to be in an atrium… and, perhaps make a new space for some sort of medium that we aren’t even aware of yet. Oh la la.

October 25th, 2011

suddenly loving my world: reading architecture theory… on an ipad… before bed… in total silence…

Loading tweets...

@daisyames

master of architecture candidate at yale. athlete. builder. painter. habitually punctilious. occasionally insouciant.