January 9th, 2012

Spring 2012… back in action!

It was the first weekend back at Yale and we had class all weekend - learning Revit. While we already had a few tutorials on Revit last year, this year we are expected to integrate MEP (mechanical, electrical and plumbing) systems into our structures. It’s extremely fascinating how already, in these few days, the dialogue around design has changed significantly once the reality of floor plate thicknesses and duct-work has been introduced. 

I was apprehensive about System Integration, but firms are starting to be required to make the leap and communicate better with contractors and other consultants via such programs. It’s really nice to have it included into our curriculum as second years students.

It was my first night working in studio, and I felt my heart racing with excitement for the coming year. Plus, I just came home to a few paintings I worked on over the weekend drying on my kitchen table, and Log 22 on my bed. Feeling very fortunate. 

December 21st, 2011

night shot - memorial to the murdered jews by peter eisenman

December 9th, 2011
Sometimes people just don’t understand - in which case, you help them. And then, sometimes, it’s you who doesn’t understand - in which case, you figure it out yourself.
 Daisy
December 8th, 2011

Peter Eisenman introducing his Advanced Studio at Yale School of Architecture to the final review critics while holding a stuffed guerilla with a football. Critics include: David Chipperfield, Harry Cobb, Peggy Deamer, Stanley Tigerman, Mark Wigley, Guido Zuilliani, Lucia Allais, Pier Vittoria Aureli and Sylvia Lavin… Very tough critics and very lively discussion so far!

November 30th, 2011

when your mind's not in the gutter but designing one...

Chris: "Oh my gawd. These are so freaking sex-y!"
Me: "Are you talking about plans by any chance?"
Chris: "I am. Come look."
That serious conversation just happened... literally talking about architectural plans of buildings.
November 29th, 2011

Rhino script for your use…

I am a big fan of axonometric drawings, partiuclarly exploded axos like the one below. So, I thought it would be helpful for those who do not have the script to provide it and include some simple directions.  

1. First, save your model under a different name because your model will get distorted.

2.  View your model in Perspective (even though no persepctive is being used)… just anything other than the given ‘top,’ ‘back,’ ‘right,’ ‘left’ etc…

3. Enter this script: ! _Select _Pause _SetActiveViewport Top _Rotate 0 30 _SetActiveViewport Right

_Shear w0 w0,0,1 -45 _SetActiveViewport Top _Zoom _All _Extents

4. Then you can view your axonometric in the Top view. 

5. From there you can Make2D to get the line-work only. 

* For this exploded axo, I saved the file in model form before ‘Making2D’ so that I could select layers and pull apart the components ie the structural framework and fenestration. After “Making2D” I was able to isolate the components and extrude the parts equidistant. And, of course, I brought it into Illustrator for line-work and a little fine tuning to come… 

November 28th, 2011

finally able to sit down tonight and crank out a model… not quite “betchin” yet but it’s getting there… still a work in progress…

November 25th, 2011
I don’t have to have a physical church. What could be more beautiful than the church in which you are surrounded by nature. This is my God.
Julius Shulman, architectural photographer
November 22nd, 2011

Stairs are a designed experience, use them…

Unless I am carrying something heavy or fragile, I always take the stairs. Call me old-school, I’ll take it, just don’t make me take the elevator. I really enjoy the formal entrance of the Rudolph Building with its wide stretch, low rise and deep run. It makes me appreciate the process of entering the building as it was intended and designed. Whereas, I find elevators cheapen the experience of a building and leave me feeling a bit jipped when I immediately arrive at my destination. I have spent hours designing stairs in my studio project, and interrogated various stair typologies - ie the ones that were meant as a means of egress verses the ones that exist only as a symbol and never actually used. 

*(Yale Architecture Building by Paul Rudolph on the left, Nanjing Museum by Steven Holl on the right.)

Stairs are wonderful! They force you to understand where you are in a building, what each level means to the different users, and most importantly, allows you to interact on a normal and perfectly brief moment with others inhabiting the building as well. The elevator, however, forces you into an awkwardly silent, deathly state, where you’re constantly teeter-tottering on the idea of asking the person you’re in the elevator with how they are doing. Once you do, it’s always time to go - never allowing a conversation to blossom or end smoothly. The stair allows you to say hi, engage in conversation if desired, or smile at the very least. And, a well-designed stair, like the Yale Architecture building, provides landings at every turnaround, making it easy for one to step to the side to talk or simply “rest” quietly and look out the openings on to York Street. These human interactions are at the core of what architecture is able to achieve, and are important to consider when designing. 

I say to hell with the elevator, move your ass, and take the stairs… it just may get a little firmer! Who knows!?!


November 18th, 2011
bryanmaddock:

Paul Rudolph Hall Expansion [Gwathmey Siegel / 2008]

thanks for this bryan. missed seeing you last night at the reception… 

bryanmaddock:

Paul Rudolph Hall Expansion [Gwathmey Siegel / 2008]

thanks for this bryan. missed seeing you last night at the reception… 

November 16th, 2011
Man has access to the entire mind of the Creator, is himself the creator in the finite.

I came across this quote last night in my reading for a course on drawing, pulled from Nature by Ralph Waldo Emerson. This quote was used in reference to the presence of the artist as the creator who embeds a sense of authorship, process, and even himself as the subject of the work. However, like most of the readings about drawing - relating to truth, perception, and self-reflection - I immediately apply it to life in general. I feel strongly that no answers in life can be answered by anyone but yourself. Each person holds “self-evident truths” that are so ingrained into the person they are, that to act upon another’s inclinations is a crime. Understanding another’s point of view, of course, is very different than putting into action their particular and subjective interpretation. After all they are calling on their own “self-evident truths” that are inherently different than your own. It is important to ask yourself questions and recognize your own perception of situations. This will affirm your understanding of your self as the Creator… one who puts in to action innate truths which will bolster, if not validate, the integrity of your finite solution. In architecture, knowing and constantly being aware of what you want to achieve, too, leads to an oeuvre that is consistently evolving over time towards a particular articulation of your own style. 


November 15th, 2011

crazy beautiful video… totally feeds to my obsession with bodies, muscles, dancing, lines, light, shadow, contrast, intensity and just general passion in motion… good stuff @amritaraja

Reblogged from Still processing.
Loading tweets...

@daisyames

master of architecture candidate at yale. athlete. builder. painter. habitually punctilious. occasionally insouciant.